A neo-positivist theory of scientific change
Historians of science appear to agree on two things. There is a shortage of large-scale histories of science, and positivism is best avoided. In fact, we have many big-picture histories of science. The problem is not the lack of such histories but the lack of agreement between them. They differ with...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Michael Bycroft, James Poskett |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2024-01-01
|
Series: | BJHS Themes |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2058850X24000067/type/journal_article |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The issue of Rejection of Positivist and Materialist Reflections in Turkish Thought
by: Aba Müslim Akdemir
Published: (2016-07-01) -
Neo-Riemannian Theory
by: Edward Gollin
Published: (2005-04-01) -
Moral Foundations of the Theory of Education in Russian Neo-Kantianism
by: P. A. Vladimirov, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
À propos de la théorie du néo-surtravail
by: Benoit Giry
Published: (2015-06-01) -
Neo-Characterization in the Neo-Victorian Novel
by: Georges LETISSIER
Published: (2015-12-01)